 |
Did you hear the one about men hunting
women with paintballs?
By Maureen Ryan Tribune staff
reporter Published July 28,
2003
The story had
sex, violence and, well, more sex. In other words, the "Hunting for
Bambi" controversy was a dream come true for the news media and
outraged commentators. Too bad it was a scam.
In mid-July, a
Web site stirred up a controversy by advertising that, for a fat
fee, men could "hunt" naked women with paintball guns in the Nevada
desert. A Las Vegas TV station was the first to report on the
so-called Bambi hunts, and predictably enough, a storm of
condemnation followed.
All
along though, some online observers and a few print journalists
raised questions about the site and its owner, Michael Burdick: Were
the hunts Burdick was selling real? Or was the whole thing a
well-executed stunt to get publicity for Burdick's X-rated video
business?
Finally Burdick admitted to city officials on
Thursday that the hunts were a hoax, according to the Las Vegas
Review-Journal, confirming the skeptics' doubts. But the larger
question remains unanswered -- did determining the truth about an
Internet site offering "Bambi hunts" ever really matter to the news
media fueled by sensational stories; to the public appetite for the
tacky and bizarre; or to columnists and pundits who get outraged for
a living?
Wired.com reporter Leander Kahney, who has
investigated his share of online hoaxes, attributes some of the
Bambi-mania to the Internet. "The Internet is very viral and news
spreads quickly," he said. "People just aren't skeptical
enough."
The nature of the Bambi hunts stoked the story, said
J.D. Lasica, senior editor at the Online Journalism Review, a Web
site published by the University of Southern California's journalism
school.
"A story editor at a newspaper or TV station tends to
see it as a soft-news feature, a story about what a wacky world we
live in," he said. "They won't commit the resources to tracking down
its truthfulness because it's too good to pass up, and they don't
believe the subject matter warrants serious treatment."
Here
is how the Bambi hoax virally "infected" the Internet and the
mainstream media.
KLAS-TV in Las Vegas on July 10 was the
first news outlet to report on the Bambi Web site and the hunts. The
station's managing editor, Eric Hulnick, says reporter LuAnne
Sorrell first heard about the Bambi site through a press release
that was e-mailed to several reporters at the station.
On
July 13, a link to the story on KLAS' Web site appeared on Fark.com,
a "news of the weird" site that gets a million hits a day. The next
day, the KLAS-Bambi link showed up on Metafilter.com, another
popular alternative news site, and soon that link was popping up on
sites all over the Internet.
It wasn't long before more
mainstream news outlets joined in on Bambi-hunting stories. Between
July 15 and 18, stories from UPI, Reuters and the Fox News Web site
were picked up by a host of other media organizations.
In the
various stories and interviews, no one pressed Burdick much for
proof of the Bambi hunts -- the names of satisfied customers,
receipts, etc. In a July 17 Fox News interview with Burdick,
commentator Bill O'Reilly called the Bambi tale "sad but true." In a
segment on CNN the same day, anchor Anderson Cooper also presented
the story as true and interviewed the mayor of Las Vegas, Burdick
and others in a straightforward manner.
The July 16 Fox News
online story quoted Burdick and his Web site, a woman identified as
"Taylor" -- no last name -- who said she was one of the "Bambi"
targets, a legal expert, and it added an outraged quote from a
feminist leader attributed to a New York Post story. The Post story
was even skimpier; its only other source was a Bambi spokesman named
"Paul" who was quoted as saying 20 hunts had already taken
place.
By that point, it didn't seem to matter how skeptical
or thorough the reporting was -- the tale had taken on a life of its
own. "A Web site can spread some story around, and if a newspaper
somewhere picks it up, that's when it goes haywire," says Drew
Curtis of Fark.com, who gets hundreds of "tips" for his site that
turn out to be hoaxes. "It seems like anything that hits the [wire
services] gets picked up verbatim."
Few journalists paid heed
to Snopes.com, a site devoted to debunking hoaxes, which posted a
skeptical entry about the story on their site soon after it broke.
By July 19, the Snopes folks were saying they thought the Bambi site
was a scam. As proof, the Snopes diggers unearthed an earlier
version of the Web site that was still accessible: It said nothing
about men being able to buy Bambi hunts; it only promoted naked
"hunting" videos.
The print press in Las Vegas also helped
expose Burdick. The Las Vegas Sun reported on July 17 that Burdick's
business license was for selling videos ("no porn," his application
said) -- not Bambi safaris. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reported
the same day that the "hunter" KLAS interviewed was a producer of
topless videos who, if he was to be believed, somehow came up with
$4,000 for his Bambi-hunt despite living in a tiny condo in a seedy
part of Vegas.
But by this time, America's pundits and
columnists were in full outrage mode. Columnist Kathleen Parker of
the Orlando Sentinel, a Tribune-owned newspaper, penned a column
roundly denouncing Burdick, but later wrote to a journalism Web site
saying she subsequently realized the hunts might be a
hoax.
In her letter to the Poynter.org journalism site,
Parker said "if it was indeed a hoax, it was an elaborate one. It
also changes nothing about the substance of my column, which was
general commentary on the culture that `coughed up' the idea of
Bambi hunts."
In an anti-Bambi column in the St. Louis Post
Dispatch, columnist Sylvester Brown Jr. cited the Snopes site's
doubts, but went on to say that "the company's legitimacy doesn't
really matter now," because someone, no doubt, would copy the
idea.
By its very nature, the Internet lends itself to
pranks. A fake news item recently announced Metallica was suing
another rock band for using the E and F "power chords," a silly tale
that got some notice before it was debunked.
But speaking to
the larger issue, Lasica, via e-mail, commented: "I'm always amazed
at the credulity of people who tend to believe something just
because they read it on the Internet. We need to fine-tune our B.S.
meters by expressing skepticism each time we come across a far-out
story from an unverified source."
Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune
|